Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse

Call For A Free Consultation Today | 317-505-1342

  • Home
  • About Our Firm
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Attorney Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Our Firm
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Attorney Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. Civil Litigation
  4.  ► 
  5. New Medicare Laws Impact Personal Injury Cases

New Medicare Laws Impact Personal Injury Cases

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jul 26, 2009 | Civil Litigation, Indiana Laws, Personal Injury Litigation |

When handling personal injury claims, plaintiffs’ counsel often address the resolution of subrogation liens, including those asserted by Medicare.  Under federal statutes, Medicare is entitled to reimbursement when an injured Medicare recipient receives benefits which are later recovered through a settlement or judgment.  New legislation has now given Medicare an effective – and harsh – means of recovering its subrogation lien.In 2007 the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act (the “Act”) was signed into law, placing new and more detailed requirements on liability insurance companies in claims dealing with Medicare recipients.  This 2007 Amendment, effective July 1, 2009, is the counterpart to the 2003 Amendment, which focused on plaintiffs and their attorneys.  The 2007 Act increases the enforcement power for Medicare reimbursement by extending liability to insurers and adding damages, penalties and fines for noncompliance.

If Medicare is not contacted early, the process of resolving these subrogation liens can be arduous and time consuming.  Furthermore, failing to address a Medicare lien can result in substantial losses to plaintiffs’ counsel and their clients due to penalties and fines.  When Medicare has not been properly reimbursed, the Agency can recover reimbursements from any party that received proceeds from the settlement or award, including plaintiffs, attorneys, and insurers, even if the insurer already paid the claim to the plaintiff.  The Act impacts plaintiffs in at least two ways.  First, Medicare can recover from plaintiffs and their attorneys if the lien is not properly reimbursed, and additional penalties can be assessed.  Secondly, insurers will now require proof of compliance with Medicare’s lien before paying a plaintiff, as that insurer can be liable to Medicare if the plaintiff does not properly comply with the Act.  The 2007 Amendments provide, in part, that insurers are subject to a fine of $1,000 per day for non-compliance for each individual with whom they are out of compliance.  42 U.S.C. § 1395 (2009).  This fine is in addition to the interest and double damages that can be assessed for failure to reimburse Medicare in a timely manner.  Id.  In addition to these changes, in 2006 the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services approved a single, national Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractor (MSPRC) to handle all claims.The effect of the Act is not limited to its impact upon plaintiffs, their attorneys and liability insurance companies.  Medicare can also recover reimbursements from any involved party that received proceeds from a settlement, judgment, award or other payment, including, but not limited to, beneficiaries, attorneys, providers, and suppliers.In calculating Medicare’s subrogation reimbursement, Medicare’s lien can still be reduced for a pro rata share of attorney fees and litigation expenses, known as “procurement costs”.   Medicare’s portion of these “procurement costs” is deducted from the gross lien to determine Medicare’s net recovery.  In addition, Medicare may agree to waive its lien, or a portion of it, in recognition of a plaintiff’s financial, personal and medical circumstances.When negotiating with Medicare, it is important to remember that while the Indiana Comparative Fault Act’s (Ind. Code § 34-51-2-19) lien reduction provision can reduce Medicaid liens, Pedraza by Pedraza v. Grande, 712 N.E.2d 1007 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999); In re Guardianship of Wade, 711 N.E.2d 851 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999), it cannot reduce Medicare liens due to federal preemption. For this reason, plaintiffs’ counsel is forced to negotiate with Medicare under the terms allowed by federal rules discussed above.In cases involving the need for post recovery treatment, plaintiffs’ net recoveries may also be reduced for future medical expenses anticipated to be paid by Medicare.  Although based on a statutory provision in effect for over 20 years (42 U.S.C. §§ 1395(y)(b)(2)(A)), Medicare has in the past 4 years begun requiring Medicare Set-Aside (MSA) arrangements for future medical expenses in cases which involve worker’s compensation settlements.  When a settlement pays for future medical expenses, Medicare may require a MSA arrangement funded with settlement proceeds to pay for future, injury related medical expenses covered by Medicare.The new Medicare statute means it is more important than ever to immediately get on top of plaintiffs’ liens and subrogations.  When handling a case involving a Medicare recipient, counsel should immediately notify Medicare, which can be notified by mail at MSPRC Liability, P.O. Box 33828, Detroit, MI 48232-5828.  While the Medicare claims process may seem difficult, MSPRC’s website (www.msprc.info/) provides instructions for resolving Medicare liens, including flow charts of the claims process.  In the end, waiting to notify Medicare until after the case is resolved will likely result in delaying the resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims. Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse has attorneys who are experienced in handling personal injury  claims involving Medicare liens.  If you have questions, please contact our office toll free at 888-532-7766.

What should you do after a crash on I-465 or I-70?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 27, 2025 | Car Accidents

You're driving I-465 like you've done a hundred times before — fast, focused and trying to get somewhere. Then it happens. A sudden jolt, a loud impact, maybe the screech of tires or the crunch of metal. Everything feels disoriented for a second, but your mind starts...

The rights and duties of bicycle drivers in Indiana

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 15, 2025 | Bicycle Accidents

Bicycling is a beloved activity for many in Indiana, offering a means of transportation and a way to enjoy the outdoors. Still, sharing the road with motor vehicles can present significant risks. To safeguard cyclists, Indiana has various laws that address bicycle...

Costs of loss: recovering damages in child wrongful death cases

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 28, 2025 | Wrongful Death

You can lose the ones you love for the most mundane reasons. A seemingly innocent meal purchased at a local grocery store can cost you more than you intended to pay. Late last year, grieving mother Shantria Weddle filed a wrongful death lawsuit. Weddle’s 12-year-old...

Modern twists on the age-old problem of distracted driving

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 31, 2025 | Car Accidents

We all know texting while driving is dangerous. But have you looked around your car lately? Modern vehicles come packed with screens, buttons and alerts that can pull your attention from the road just as quickly as a phone. And outside your windows are plenty of...

What are the most common causes of car accidents in Indianapolis?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 21, 2025 | Car Accidents

Several factors consistently contribute to vehicular accidents in the Indianapolis area. Data shows the following are top causes of accidents in the area: Alcohol: Recent research conducted by Indiana University’s Public Policy institute finds that a top cause of...

What are unique factors of commercial truck accidents?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 21, 2025 | Truck Accidents

When driving on Interstate 465, I-70 or I-65 around Indianapolis, you’ve likely felt dwarfed by massive commercial trucks barreling down the highway. The sheer size disparity between your vehicle and a fully loaded semi creates potentially catastrophic consequences in...

Am I liable for a car accident on a slippery road?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 20, 2025 | Car Accidents

Heavy rain or snow can create hazardous driving situations. Wet roads can cause cars to slide or skid, making it hard to control your vehicle. Icy patches are even more dangerous, as they can be nearly invisible and cause sudden loss of traction. On snowy or rainy...

When Businesses Have a Duty to Protect Their Customers: The Foreseeable Attack

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Dec 12, 2023 | Premises Liability

On November 29, 2023, the Indiana Court of Appeals published its Opinion in Brummett v. Bailey, 23A-CT-683, slip op. Brummett is the latest case in a string of Indiana Court of Appeals decisions following the Indiana Supreme Court’s Goodwin v. Yeakle’s Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., 62 N.E.3d 384, 389 (Ind. 2016). In these cases, the courts have been grappling…

Thu v. Willis and the Necessity of Expert Medical Testimony

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Aug 28, 2023 | Car Accidents

On March 13, 2023, in a memorandum decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s decision for the plaintiff in a negligence complaint despite the defendant-appellant’s argument that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence that the car accident at issue was the proximate cause of his injuries. In this case, Thu v. Willis,[1] Guy Willis Sr. (“Willis”)…

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Craighead: Protecting the Purpose of Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 22, 2023 | Car Accidents, Insurance, Underinsured Motorist ("UIM") Claims

In a case determined in September 2022, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided an important and common issue for injury victims when dealing with their own insurance in its opinion in Erie Insurance Exchange v. Craighead. Many drivers who are injured as a result of an underinsured motorist turn to their own underinsured motorist coverage and medical payments coverage to…

« Older Entries

Recent Posts

  • What should you do after a crash on I-465 or I-70?
  • The rights and duties of bicycle drivers in Indiana
  • Costs of loss: recovering damages in child wrongful death cases
  • Modern twists on the age-old problem of distracted driving
  • What are the most common causes of car accidents in Indianapolis?

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse

Phone
317-505-1342

  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052
Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601

Review The Firm

© 2025 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw