Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse

Call For A Free Consultation Today | 317-505-1342

  • Home
  • About Our Firm
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Attorney Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Our Firm
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Attorney Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. Nursing Home Cases
  4.  ► 
  5. False Claims Act Lawsuit Alleging Medicaid Fraud Against Indiana Nursing Home Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

False Claims Act Lawsuit Alleging Medicaid Fraud Against Indiana Nursing Home Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Dec 14, 2012 | Nursing Home Cases |

A lawsuit brought under the federal False Claims Act (FCA) by an Indiana resident, involving allegations that an Indiana nursing home had defrauded the Medicaid system, failed to establish that the court had subject matter jurisdiction, according to a recent ruling by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court held in United States ex rel. Black v. Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County that the relator, who filed the qui tam lawsuit on behalf of the United States, did not produce evidence to show that he had originally discovered the allegedly fraudulent acts. Allegations of Medicaid or Medicare fraud are of interest to nursing home negligence attorneys because of the impact fraud can have on the quality of care received by residents. This case primarily demonstrates the complexity of the Medicaid system and the multitude of ways that nursing homes can abide by, or defraud, that system.

The relator, Paul R. Black, reportedly first filed suit against Health & Hospital Corporation of Marion County (HHC), pursuant to the FCA, in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in October 2003. When the United States government did not intervene in the suit, he dismissed it without prejudice. He filed the present suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in February 2008. The United States has also declined to intervene in this lawsuit.

Black alleges that HHC has used three state-level Medicaid funding systems to present falsified or otherwise fraudulent claims to state and federal Medicaid officials. States may directly reimburse Medicaid providers up to an Upper Payment Limit (UPL) set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), equal to the amount the provider could obtain through Medicare. In order to facilitate reimbursement of providers, CMS allows states to transfer money from local government bodies to the state’s Medicaid fund, in a process known as an intergovernmental transfer (IGT). Finally, CMS may approve expenditures by providers, known as Certified Public Expenditures (CPEs), that allow providers to claim direct reimbursement from federal matching funds. CMS has expressed concerns about the potential for fraud in these systems several times in the past decade.

Black alleges that HHC has defrauded Medicaid by using falsified or fraudulent IGTs and CPEs to obtain funds from Medicaid in greater amounts than it had actually spent on the procedures, which he characterizes as unlawfully profiting from Medicaid. His lawsuit asserts four causes of action under the FCA for submitting factually false claims to CMS, submitting legally false claims to CMS, creating and using false documents and statements to obtain benefits from CMS, and conspiracy to defraud the federal government.

Based on prior reports and proposed rules issued by CMS regarding the possibility of fraud in the above-described funding mechanisms, HHC moved to dismiss Black’s suit under the Public Disclosure Bar, described in 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4)(A). The Maryland district court agreed and dismissed the suit. The Public Disclosure Bar precludes qui tam suits for matters disclosed in official hearings or by the news media. The purpose of this exclusion is to prevent qui tam lawsuits based on information available to the general public. Because Black failed to establish that he was an “original source” of the information forming the basis of the lawsuit, the court applied the Public Disclosure Bar. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the court’s ruling.

The Indiana attorneys at Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse represent the interests of nursing home residents who have been the victims of abuse or neglect, helping them obtain compensation for their damages. Contact us today online or at 888-532-7766 to schedule a free and confidential consultation with one of our lawyers.

More Blog Posts:

Attorney Paul Kruse Responds to Editorial on Tort Reform for Medical Malpractice Lawsuits, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, November 7, 2009
New Medicare Laws Impact Personal Injury Cases, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, July 26, 2009

What should you do after a crash on I-465 or I-70?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 27, 2025 | Car Accidents

You're driving I-465 like you've done a hundred times before — fast, focused and trying to get somewhere. Then it happens. A sudden jolt, a loud impact, maybe the screech of tires or the crunch of metal. Everything feels disoriented for a second, but your mind starts...

The rights and duties of bicycle drivers in Indiana

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 15, 2025 | Bicycle Accidents

Bicycling is a beloved activity for many in Indiana, offering a means of transportation and a way to enjoy the outdoors. Still, sharing the road with motor vehicles can present significant risks. To safeguard cyclists, Indiana has various laws that address bicycle...

Costs of loss: recovering damages in child wrongful death cases

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 28, 2025 | Wrongful Death

You can lose the ones you love for the most mundane reasons. A seemingly innocent meal purchased at a local grocery store can cost you more than you intended to pay. Late last year, grieving mother Shantria Weddle filed a wrongful death lawsuit. Weddle’s 12-year-old...

Modern twists on the age-old problem of distracted driving

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 31, 2025 | Car Accidents

We all know texting while driving is dangerous. But have you looked around your car lately? Modern vehicles come packed with screens, buttons and alerts that can pull your attention from the road just as quickly as a phone. And outside your windows are plenty of...

What are the most common causes of car accidents in Indianapolis?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 21, 2025 | Car Accidents

Several factors consistently contribute to vehicular accidents in the Indianapolis area. Data shows the following are top causes of accidents in the area: Alcohol: Recent research conducted by Indiana University’s Public Policy institute finds that a top cause of...

What are unique factors of commercial truck accidents?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 21, 2025 | Truck Accidents

When driving on Interstate 465, I-70 or I-65 around Indianapolis, you’ve likely felt dwarfed by massive commercial trucks barreling down the highway. The sheer size disparity between your vehicle and a fully loaded semi creates potentially catastrophic consequences in...

Am I liable for a car accident on a slippery road?

On Behalf of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 20, 2025 | Car Accidents

Heavy rain or snow can create hazardous driving situations. Wet roads can cause cars to slide or skid, making it hard to control your vehicle. Icy patches are even more dangerous, as they can be nearly invisible and cause sudden loss of traction. On snowy or rainy...

When Businesses Have a Duty to Protect Their Customers: The Foreseeable Attack

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Dec 12, 2023 | Premises Liability

On November 29, 2023, the Indiana Court of Appeals published its Opinion in Brummett v. Bailey, 23A-CT-683, slip op. Brummett is the latest case in a string of Indiana Court of Appeals decisions following the Indiana Supreme Court’s Goodwin v. Yeakle’s Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., 62 N.E.3d 384, 389 (Ind. 2016). In these cases, the courts have been grappling…

Thu v. Willis and the Necessity of Expert Medical Testimony

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Aug 28, 2023 | Car Accidents

On March 13, 2023, in a memorandum decision, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court’s decision for the plaintiff in a negligence complaint despite the defendant-appellant’s argument that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence that the car accident at issue was the proximate cause of his injuries. In this case, Thu v. Willis,[1] Guy Willis Sr. (“Willis”)…

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Craighead: Protecting the Purpose of Underinsured Motorist Coverage

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 22, 2023 | Car Accidents, Insurance, Underinsured Motorist ("UIM") Claims

In a case determined in September 2022, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided an important and common issue for injury victims when dealing with their own insurance in its opinion in Erie Insurance Exchange v. Craighead. Many drivers who are injured as a result of an underinsured motorist turn to their own underinsured motorist coverage and medical payments coverage to…

« Older Entries

Recent Posts

  • What should you do after a crash on I-465 or I-70?
  • The rights and duties of bicycle drivers in Indiana
  • Costs of loss: recovering damages in child wrongful death cases
  • Modern twists on the age-old problem of distracted driving
  • What are the most common causes of car accidents in Indianapolis?

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse

Phone
317-505-1342

  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052
Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601

Review The Firm

© 2025 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw