ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
Call For A Free Consultation | 317-505-1342
Review Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. Car Accidents
  4.  ► 
  5. Court Finds At-Fault Driver’s Employer Not Liable Under Vicarious Liability Theory

Court Finds At-Fault Driver’s Employer Not Liable Under Vicarious Liability Theory

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Oct 12, 2016 | Car Accidents, Personal Injury Litigation |

Last month, an appellate court in California issued an interesting opinion regarding when a negligent driver’s employer can also be held liable in a personal injury lawsuit. In the case, Jorge v. Culinary Institute of America, the court ultimately determined that since the fatal accident occurred while the defendant’s employee was on his way home from work and was not engaged in any work-related activity, the defendant was not vicariously liable for the employee’s actions.

The Facts of the Case

Da Fonseca worked for the defendant, the Culinary Institute of America. He was an instructor who worked primarily at one location but occasionally did some consulting for the defendant at various other locations. On the day of the accident, Jorge was his way home from work with his chef’s jacket and knives in the car. At some point on his commute back home, he struck and killed Jorge, a 14-year-old boy, with his car.

Jorge’s family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against both Da Fonseca and the Culinary Institute. Da Fonseca and Jorge’s family reached a mutually acceptable settlement agreement, so the case proceeded only against the Culinary Institute. The Institute’s request to dismiss the case based on a lack of vicarious liability was denied, and after a jury trial, a verdict of roughly $885,000 was awarded to Jorge’s family.

The Culinary Institute appealed the issue of whether Da Fonseca was acting as an employee of the Culinary Institute at the time of the accident. The court determined that Da Fonseca was not acting as an employee at the time of the accident, and therefore the Culinary Institute was not liable to Jorge’s family. The court reasoned that the accident occurred during Da Fonseca’s commute home, rather than during any work-related activity. The court explained that in some cases, an act of negligence on a commute may result in employer liability, but the facts present in this case did not warrant vicarious liability. As a result, Jorge’s family will not be permitted to seek recovery from the Culinary Institute and will be left with the award they obtained though their settlement with Da Fonseca.

Have You Been Injured in an Indiana Car or Truck Accident?

If you or a loved one has recently been injured in any kind of Indiana car accident, you may be entitled to monetary compensation to help you cover the costs associated with the accident. It is important to keep in mind that all potentially liable parties should be named as defendants, since a failure to do so may result in an unnecessary delay or even a limitation on your recovery amount. To learn more about how employers may be held responsible for the negligent acts of their employees, call the Indiana personal injury law firm of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse at 888-532-7766 to set up a free consultation today.

Related Posts:

Appellate Court Upholds $3.75 Million Medical Malpractice Verdict Stemming from Improperly Sanitized Medical Equipment, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, September 6, 2016

Court Broadly Interprets Good Samaritan Law to Include Non-Medical Professionals Who Provide Any Kind of Emergency Treatment, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, September 20, 2016

Recent Posts

  • Indiana appeals court affirms bad-faith claim against Erie Insurance
  • Should you seek medical care after a minor car crash in Indiana?
  • Can dashcam footage help your Indiana car accident claim?
  • What happens to your car accident claim if the at-fault driver dies in the crash?
  • What to do if a car door opens into your path in Indianapolis

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys

Phone
317-505-1342

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052

Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601
Review The Firm

© 2026 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw