ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
Call For A Free Consultation | 317-505-1342
Review Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. BlogPage 14

Our Personal Injury Blog

 

Court Discusses Grocery Store’s Duty to Keep Store Free of Dangerous Hazards

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Aug 6, 2018 | Premises Liability

All business owners owe their customers a duty of care to keep areas accessible to customers in a reasonably safe condition. This generally means eliminating any known hazards, conducting frequent inspections to discover hazards, and warning customers of hazards that are either in the process of being fixed or cannot be fixed. If a business owner fails to live up…

How Some Defendants May Attempt to Use the “Sudden Emergency Doctrine” to Evade Liability

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jul 26, 2018 | Aggressive Driving, Car Accidents, Truck Accidents

Recently, a state appellate court issued an opinion in a personal injury case discussing what the court called the “sudden emergency doctrine,” explaining how it may be applied to excuse what may otherwise be considered negligent behavior. The case is important to Indiana car accident victims because the doctrine is also applied by Indiana courts. The Facts of the Case…

Indiana Court Determines Wires Running Across Hospital Room Floor Were Not an Obvious Hazard

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jul 18, 2018 | Personal Injury Litigation, Premises Liability

Recently, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a case presenting an interesting issue for many Indiana personal injury accident victims. The case involved an Indiana premises liability lawsuit, and required the court determine whether a group of wires on a hospital room floor were an obvious hazard or, in the alternative, if the plaintiff knew of their presence.…

Indiana Supreme Court Rejects Estate’s UIM Claim

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jul 12, 2018 | Car Accidents, Indiana Supreme Court Decisions, Insurance Policies

Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in an Indiana car accident case discussing whether a man who was killed by an uninsured driver was covered under his employer’s car insurance policy. Finding that the policy did not include the employee as a covered person under the terms of the contract, and finding that the terms…

Jury Must Determine if Plaintiff’s Delay in Notifying Insurance Company of Accident was Excused

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jul 5, 2018 | Car Accidents, Insurance, Personal Injury Litigation

A state appellate court recently issued an opinion in a car accident case involving a plaintiff’s claim that was denied by the defendant insurance company. The case required the court to consider whether a lower court was proper to grant the insurance company’s motion for summary judgment based on the fact that the plaintiff waited eight months to notify the…

Indiana Product Liability Act May Require Expert Testimony in Some Product Liability Cases

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jun 25, 2018 | Products Liability

Earlier this month, a federal appellate court issued a written opinion in an Indiana product liability case dismissing a plaintiff’s case for failing to file the required expert’s affidavit. The case is important for all Indiana product liability plaintiffs, because it explains when an expert witness may be required and also illustrates the potential consequences of not complying with the…

Trial Judge Improperly Weighs Evidence During Summary Judgment Motion in Recent Premises Liability Lawsuit

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jun 18, 2018 | Premises Liability

In many Indiana personal injury cases, one or more parties files a motion for summary judgment before the witnesses are sworn and the actual trial begins. By filing a motion for summary judgment, a party is asking the trial judge to make a determination that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In other words, the filing…

Court Holds Horse-Drawn Carriage Accident Falls Outside UIM Policy Coverage

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jun 11, 2018 | Car Accidents, Personal Injury

Recently, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case that raises an interesting issue confronting many Indiana car accident plaintiffs. The case required the court to determine if the plaintiff’s insurance company was required to provide underinsured motorist coverage in an accident involving a horse-drawn carriage. Ultimately, the court took a close look at the…

Court Discusses the Summary Judgment Standard in Recent Premises Liability Lawsuit

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Jun 5, 2018 | Premises Liability

In Indiana personal injury cases, before a case reaches trial, it will likely go through the summary judgment stage. Summary judgment is a process in which either party can ask the court to rule in their favor before witnesses are sworn or evidence is considered. Essentially, the court reviews the pleadings, accepting all uncontested facts as true, and then makes…

Dog Bite Cases in Indiana

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 29, 2018 | Dog Bites

Under Indiana law, the owners of dogs can be held liable for injuries caused by their pets. It is important to understand the type of Indiana dog bite claim that is being brought because the requirements vary depending on several factors. Indiana Code section 15-20-1-3 discusses a situation in which a mail carrier, police officer, or other person carrying out…

« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Recent Posts

  • Navigating new Indiana electronic evidence rules in trucking litigation
  • 5 dangerous roadside hazards in Indiana and how to avoid them
  • Proving liability in commercial trucking: The black box advantage
  • Indiana appeals court affirms bad-faith claim against Erie Insurance
  • Should you seek medical care after a minor car crash in Indiana?

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys

Phone
317-505-1342

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052

Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601
Review The Firm

© 2026 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw