ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
Call For A Free Consultation | 317-505-1342
Review Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. BlogPage 16

Our Personal Injury Blog

 

Federal Court Issues Opinion in Negligent Entrustment Case

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 11, 2018 | Car Accidents, Motorcycle Accidents, Personal Injury Litigation

The legal theory of negligent entrustment allows for an Indiana car accident victim to seek compensation from the owner of a vehicle who negligently allowed another person to use the vehicle that was involved in the accident. Since a negligent entrustment claim allows for an accident victim to hold a third party (the vehicle’s owner) liable for the negligent actions…

Court Rules in Business’ Favor in Recent Premises Liability Lawsuit Involving Children at Play

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 2, 2018 | Premises Liability

Earlier this month, a federal appellate court issued an opinion in a personal injury lawsuit illustrating an issue that may have an impact on some Indiana premises liability cases involving children who have been injured while in the company of their parents. The case presented the court with an opportunity to discuss how a parent’s presence can act to reduce…

Court Rules on Dog Bite Case, Finding for Plaintiff

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 26, 2018 | Dog Bites, Personal Injury Litigation

Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case involving a plaintiff who was mauled by a pack of four or five dogs. The case presented the court with the opportunity to discuss whether the state imposes strict liability on the owners of dogs and, if so, whether the doctrine of comparative fault…

Court Affirms Dismissal of Premises Liability Case, Finding Hazard Was “Open and Obvious”

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 19, 2018 | Premises Liability

As a general rule, landowners have a duty to ensure that their property is safe for those whom they invite onto their land. An invitation may be an explicit one, such as an invitation to join a neighbor for dinner, or it may be implicit given the circumstances, such as a customer who visits a business. In either case, a…

Appellate Court Affirms Denial of Car Accident Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 11, 2018 | Car Accidents, Personal Injury Litigation

Earlier this month, an appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case affirming the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial based on the alleged failure of the jury to consider what the plaintiff claimed to be uncontroverted evidence. The court, however, interpreted the evidence differently, finding that the evidence presented at trial was in…

Handyman’s Case Against Homeowner Dismissed Based on His Awareness of the Hazard That Caused His Injury

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 5, 2018 | Premises Liability

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Georgia issued a written opinion in a personal injury case that clearly illustrates an issue that frequently arises in Indiana premises liability cases. The case involved a handyman who was seriously injured while moving a piece of glass while working at the defendant’s home. The case required the court to determine if the…

Dealing with Difficult Insurance Companies After an Indiana Car Accident

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Feb 26, 2018 | Car Accidents, Insurance

Being involved in an Indiana car accident is a traumatic experience, and the road to recovery can be a long one. Initially, accident victims must deal with the physical and emotional injuries sustained in the crash. This can take months, if not longer. However, at some point, an Indiana car accident victim must also face the financial impact of the…

Court Strictly Interprets Recreational Use Statute, Rejecting Plaintiff’s Premises Liability Claim

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Feb 20, 2018 | Government Liability, Premises Liability

Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case requiring the court to interpret and apply the state’s recreational use statute. Ultimately, the court interpreted the statute as written to confer immunity to the defendant landowner, so the plaintiff’s case was dismissed. While the case was brought in a different state, it discusses…

An Indiana Business Owner’s Duty to Clear Snow and Ice Hazards

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Feb 8, 2018 | Premises Liability

All landowners, especially business owners, owe a duty of care to keep their property safe for those whom they invite onto their property. The extent of the duty owed to a visitor depends on the relationship between the landowner and the visitor, but as a general rule, the highest duty is owed to someone who visits for business purposes, i.e.,…

Court Dismisses Victim’s Case Against Ski Resort Due to Signed Release Waiver

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Feb 1, 2018 | Personal Injury, Premises Liability

Earlier this month, a federal appellate court issued a written opinion in a personal injury case requiring the court to determine if a plaintiff’s case against a ski resort could proceed toward trial despite the fact that she had signed an accident-release waiver prior to her injury. After reviewing the applicable law, the court concluded that the release waiver was…

« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Recent Posts

  • 4 key evidence that proves fault in an Indiana multi-car crash
  • How black box data can reveal trucking negligence in Indiana 
  • Who pays after an Uber or Lyft crash? 3 insurance tiers explained 
  • Hidden injuries to watch out for after a car accident in Indiana
  • What records prove lost income after a serious Indiana crash?

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys

Phone
317-505-1342

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052

Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601
Review The Firm

© 2026 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw