ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
Call For A Free Consultation | 317-505-1342
Review Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. Blog

Our Personal Injury Blog

 

What Courts Consider a “Medical Malpractice” Case May Surprise Some Indiana Plaintiffs

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Nov 2, 2016 | Medical Malpractice

All personal injury cases are subject to a statute of limitations. Statutes of limitations lay out the time frame in which a plaintiff needs to file their case. If a case is filed after the statute of limitations, it will be dismissed by the court as untimely unless an exception applies. Medical malpractice cases in particular are subject to generally shortened and…

Destroying Evidence May Result in Sanctions Including a Judge Entering Judgment in Favor of Opposing Party

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Oct 25, 2016 | Personal Injury Litigation, Products Liability

Whenever someone is involved in an accident, certain duties are triggered. One of those duties is to preserve any evidence that may become useful to the opposing party in the event that a lawsuit is later filed by the accident victim. A party’s failure to preserve material evidence can result in a variety of sanctions being imposed against that party,…

Woman Recovers $1.3 Million from Supermarket After Being Struck by Grocery Cart

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Oct 17, 2016 | Premises Liability

Earlier this month, an Ohio woman recovered over $1.3 million after a jury found in her favor in a premises liability lawsuit filed against a supermarket chain. The lawsuit alleged that the supermarket chain failed to provide adequate instruction to customers using motorized shopping carts. According to one industry news source reporting on the case, the accident occurred back in…

Court Finds At-Fault Driver’s Employer Not Liable Under Vicarious Liability Theory

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Oct 12, 2016 | Car Accidents, Personal Injury Litigation

Last month, an appellate court in California issued an interesting opinion regarding when a negligent driver’s employer can also be held liable in a personal injury lawsuit. In the case, Jorge v. Culinary Institute of America, the court ultimately determined that since the fatal accident occurred while the defendant’s employee was on his way home from work and was not engaged…

Court Finds Pharmacist Has Legal Duty to Preserve Evidence of Pharmacy Error

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Oct 4, 2016 | Medication Errors

Earlier this month, a court found that pharmacists have a duty to retain medication returned to the pharmacy by a patient if the medication was returned as a result of a potential pharmacy error. The court in the case of Burton v. Walgreen Corporation held that the pharmacy should keep the returned medication because it may be relevant to an…

“Continuing Course of Treatment” Doctrine May Extend Statute of Limitations for Some Medical Malpractice Plaintiffs

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Sep 27, 2016 | Medical Malpractice

Earlier this month, one state’s appellate court discussed and adopted the “continuing course of treatment” doctrine in the context of a medical malpractice case. In the case, Parr v. Rosenthal, the court determined that it would adopt the doctrine, but it held that the specifics of the case at issue prevented the doctrine from being applied to extend the statute of…

Court Broadly Interprets Good Samaritan Law to Include Non-Medical Professionals Who Provide Any Kind of Emergency Treatment

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Sep 20, 2016 | Personal Injury Litigation, Truck Accidents

Good Samaritan laws were designed to protect passersby from liability when they try to help an injured person during an emergency. The idea is that if the law fails to offer protection to someone trying to help another person in peril, citizens are unlikely to ever offer such assistance for fear of civil liability. However, the type of conduct that is covered…

Case Arising from “Garden Variety” Traffic Accident Involving Paramedic Not Considered a Medical Malpractice Case

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Sep 13, 2016 | Car Accidents, Medical Malpractice

Earlier last month, an appellate court issued a written opinion in a car accident case brought by a man who was injured by an on-duty paramedic on his way to the scene of an accident. The case, Aldana v. Stillwagon, presented the issue of whether a case involving a regular traffic accident caused by an on-duty paramedic should be considered a…

Appellate Court Upholds $3.75 Million Medical Malpractice Verdict Stemming from Improperly Sanitized Medical Equipment

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Sep 6, 2016 | Medical Malpractice

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Idaho issued a written opinion affirming a jury’s verdict in favor of a man who lost his wife to a serious infection after undergoing a procedure at the defendant’s cosmetic clinic. In the case, Ballard v. Kerr, the court dismissed the defendant’s approximately 20 claims of error and affirmed the jury’s verdict below.…

Discrepancies in Insurance Contracts Are Often Resolved in Favor of the Insured

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Aug 25, 2016 | Car Accidents, Insurance

Auto insurance coverage is required in Indiana, and most motorists are familiar with the coverage they have and how to go about using it when the need arises. However, the contract that is entered into between a motorist and an insurance company is lengthy, and most motorists do not take the time to read over the entire policy but instead skim…

« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Recent Posts

  • Can helmet use strengthen your claim after a motorcycle crash?
  • 4 key evidence that proves fault in an Indiana multi-car crash
  • How black box data can reveal trucking negligence in Indiana 
  • Who pays after an Uber or Lyft crash? 3 insurance tiers explained 
  • Hidden injuries to watch out for after a car accident in Indiana

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys

Phone
317-505-1342

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052

Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601
Review The Firm

© 2026 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw