ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
Call For A Free Consultation | 317-505-1342
ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

Our Personal Injury Blog

 

Dividing Up Liability Among Defendants in Indiana Personal Injury Cases

| Aug 11, 2016 | ,

While some accidents only involve one plaintiff and one defendant, others involve multiple defendants. This can create an issue when it comes to determining which defendants are responsible for compensating the plaintiff in the event of a plaintiff’s verdict. Jurisdictions around the country have different methods of determining how defendants are required to compensate a plaintiff when there are several…

Statutes of Limitations in Indiana Medical Malpractice Cases

| Aug 4, 2016 |

Personal injury and medical malpractice cases are subject to a maximum amount of time that a plaintiff can wait before bringing the lawsuit. This amount of time is outlined in what is called a statute of limitations. There are several types of statutes of limitations, and determining which statute of limitations applies in any given case is not always straightforward.…

Recreational Use Statute Prevents Paralyzed Accident Victim from Seeking Compensation

| Jul 27, 2016 | ,

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Rhode Island issued an instructive opinion regarding that state’s recreational use statute and how the statute may be used by defendants to avoid liability in a premises liability case. The case is also instructive to potential premises liability plaintiffs, since it shows which facts must be pleaded and proven in order for the case to…

Court Finds Dangerous Placement of Parking Lot May Give Rise to Liability in Premises Liability Case

| Jul 20, 2016 | ,

Premises liability cases, like most other cases brought under the legal theory of negligence, require that the plaintiff establish the defendant owed them a duty of care. In many cases, this element is the easiest for the plaintiff to prove, but in others there may be substantial litigation over whether a duty of care exists. In a recent case in front…

Appellate Court Denies Insurance Company’s Jurisdictional Challenge to Accident Victim’s Lawsuit

| Jul 13, 2016 | ,

Earlier this month, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an interesting opinion illuminating the jurisdictional issues that can arise in personal injury cases. In the case, Hodge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, the plaintiff was a woman who was injured when she was struck by a vehicle insured by State Farm. After the accident, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit…

Government Immunity Is Not Without Its Limits

| Jul 6, 2016 | ,

State, local, and federal governments, as well as related government agencies, enjoy a general blanket of immunity from personal injury lawsuits. This means that in many cases filed against a government agency or employee, the injured party will not be permitted to recover compensation for their injuries because the named defendant is immune from liability. However, government liability does have…

Man Injured by Faulty Handrail Denied Compensation Based on Incomplete Negligence Claim

| Jun 27, 2016 | ,

Earlier this month, a West Virginia court issued a written opinion in a premises liability case brought by a man who suffered a shoulder injury when he fell after leaning on what turned out to be a damaged handrail. The court in the case of Wheeling Park Commission v. Dattoli determined that the injured man’s case against the park was…

“Assumption of the Risk Doctrine” Prevents Wrongful Death Case from Proceeding

| Jun 20, 2016 | ,

Earlier this month, an appellate court in California issued a written opinion holding that a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the father of a young man killed while skateboarding was properly dismissed below because the young boy assumed the risk of the dangerous activity in which he was engaging when he suffered his fatal injury. In the case, Bertsch v. Mammoth…

Bar Found Not Liable for Negligence after Customer Leaves and Strikes Another Patron with Vehicle

| Jun 13, 2016 | , ,

Earlier this month, the Nebraska Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Pittman v. Rivera, holding that a bar owner was not liable under a theory of negligence when one of the bar’s patrons struck another customer after being kicked out for being aggressive. The court based its decision on a lack of foreseeability at the time the bar’s…

Girl Struck by Car While Boarding School Bus Seeks Recovery from Bus Driver’s Insurance Company

| Jun 3, 2016 | ,

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Delaware issued an opinion in a personal injury case brought by the family of a young girl who was struck by a car while she was about to board her school bus. The case presented the court with an interesting question:  whether the school bus’ insurance company could be responsible for the girl’s…

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed