ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
Call For A Free Consultation | 317-505-1342
Review Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys
  • Home
  • About
    • Attorney Profiles
    • Our Firm History
    • Why Choose Us?
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • Verdicts And Settlements
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic Injuries
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Wrongful Death
    • More Practice Areas
  • FAQs
  • Referrals
  • Communities Served
    • Indianapolis, Indiana
    • Bloomington, Indiana
    • Columbus, Indiana
    • Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Gary, Indiana
    • More Communities Served
  • Videos
  • Contact
Email

CALL

Photo of John M. McLaughlin, Tony W. Patterson and Paul S. Kruse

Helping You Put Your Life Back On Track After A Serious Injury

  1. Home
  2.  ► 
  3. BlogPage 25

Our Personal Injury Blog

 

Medical Malpractice Case Survives Summary Judgment Based on Defendants’ Contradictory Evidence

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 23, 2016 | Indiana Supreme Court Decisions, Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice and personal injury lawsuits go through several phases before the case is submitted to a jury at trial. Two of the most important pre-trial phases are the discovery phase and the summary judgment stage. The discovery phase is where the parties exchange relevant information to the case that the opposing party may not have or know to exist.…

Plaintiff’s Premises Liability Claim Denied for Failing to Meet Filing Deadline

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 18, 2016 | Premises Liability

A state appellate court in Maine recently handed down a decision that demonstrates the importance of meeting deadlines and other procedural requirements when making a personal injury or wrongful death claim, especially when the claim is against a state or municipality. The plaintiff in the case of Deschenes v. The City of Sanford was a man who claims that he was injured when he…

Dram Shop Laws in Indiana – How Bars Can Be Held Responsible for Over Serving Customers

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 11, 2016 | Drunk Driving Accidents

Drunk driving is one of the leading causes of fatal traffic accidents in Indiana. In fact, so far this year there have been over 5,500 alcohol-related car accidents in Indiana alone. Of those, roughly 2,300 have resulted in injury, and 205 have resulted in death. These figures represent about one-third of all traffic accidents in the entire state. With drunk…

Appellate Court Determines When Evidence of a Party’s Lack of Insurance is Admissible at Trial

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | May 2, 2016 | Truck Accidents

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Maryland issued a written opinion in a case involving allegations that a cement company was negligent in the hiring of an independent contractor. In the case, Perry v. Asphalt & Concrete Services, Inc., the court ultimately decided that the plaintiff should not have been permitted to submit evidence of the truck driver’s lack…

Appellate Court Considers at Which Age Children Can Be Legally Responsible for Their Actions

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 25, 2016 | Personal Injury

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Utah issued an opinion in an interesting case considering the age at which young children can be held legally responsible for their own negligent actions. In the case, Neilsen v. Bell, the court was not provided the opportunity to consider whether the parents were liable, and it had to look solely at the…

Indiana Supreme Court Finds in Favor of Premises Liability Plaintiff against Municipality

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 18, 2016 | Government Liability, Premises Liability

Earlier this month, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a written opinion in a premises liability case involving a woman who broke her leg while crossing a street. In the case, City of Beech Grove v. Beloat, the court determined that the city was not entitled to governmental immunity because the act of maintaining the road was not “discretionary,” as defined…

Appellate Court Finds County Fair Not Responsible for Injury During Fireworks Display

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 11, 2016 | Premises Liability

Earlier this month, a North Dakota appellate court issued a written opinion finding that a county fairground was not legally responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries sustained during a free fireworks display. The court based its decision on the state’s “recreational use statute.” The Facts of Woody v. Pembina County Annual Fair & Exhibition Association The plaintiff in the case, Woody,…

Recent Appellate Court Opinion Finds in Favor of Plaintiff in Road Rage Case

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Apr 1, 2016 | Aggressive Driving

Earlier last month, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia released an opinion regarding an incident of road rage that went too far, resulting in serious injury to one of the drivers involved. In the case, Phillips v. Stear, the court reversed a lower court’s opinion that had found that the plaintiff failed to make out his case against…

The Importance of Error-Preservation at Trial in Indiana

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 23, 2016 | Personal Injury Litigation, Products Liability

When a party takes a case to trial and does not get the result they had hoped for, they can sometimes appeal the lower court’s decision to an appellate court to have the case reviewed. Most states, including Indiana, have three levels of courts: trial, intermediate appellate, and supreme. As the name implies, the trial court is where a trial takes…

Appellate Court Discusses When an Employer May Be Held Liable For an Employee’s Negligence in Recent Case

Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP | Mar 16, 2016 | Truck Accidents

Earlier this month, a federal appellate court issued an opinion in a case that began when a truck carrying a large piece of logging equipment got too close to the side of a bridge as it crossed. The logging equipment came free, ultimately crashing into a passing car. The specific issue in the case was whether the truck driver’s employer…

« Older Entries
Next Entries »

Recent Posts

  • 4 key evidence that proves fault in an Indiana multi-car crash
  • How black box data can reveal trucking negligence in Indiana 
  • Who pays after an Uber or Lyft crash? 3 insurance tiers explained 
  • Hidden injuries to watch out for after a car accident in Indiana
  • What records prove lost income after a serious Indiana crash?

Categories

Archives

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Contact Us Today

ParrRichey Frandsen Patterson Kruse | Injury Attorneys

Phone
317-505-1342

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

Indianapolis Law Office

251 North Illinois Street
Suite 1800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Lebanon Law Office

225 West Main Street
PO Box 668
Lebanon, IN 46052

Chicago Law Office

One East Wacker Drive
Suite 2600
Chicago, IL 60601
Review The Firm

© 2026 Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw